Give
me the simplest form of
matter
and motion,
and I will build, out of them, the world
of Nature.
"Give me matter,
and I will construct a world out of it."
Immanuel
Kant, Kant's
Cosmology
("Universal Natural History and Theory Of
Heavens")
0.
Motivation: Outlining
TRUTON and the Rationale for its
Existence
It
is the purpose and scope of this work to
establish theblueprint for a
rational foundation of understanding Nature from
one single principle, law, cause, or "logic" of
operation. The method employed here, never used
before in the form presented herein, is modeled
from the skeleton
of Mathematics
(som+)
where we start with certain primary
propositions, called axioms, and then using
rational thinking --and only rational deductive
thinking-- an entire bottom-up theory is
build up.
Unlike
in Mathematics (where those axioms can
be any proposition that cannot
be derived from anything else
and
cannot lead to rational contradictory
results), in TRUTON,
those primary propositions, in
addition, must have physical roots and
connotations that cannot "offend" our
given common sense (comsen).
That addition
(+)
in som
is essential indeed.
Our
modeled som+
method of discovering things in Nature, should
not be confused with the long standing method of
using Mathematics as a tool in deriving results.
We will not use Mathematics per se,
but instead we will use its
method
or the model
of Mathematics
(mom)
of how it obtains its results and nothing
else.
Asides
from the mathematical Euclidean
space that emulates the natural
structural physical space of
Nature, the plethora of other imaginary
mathematical spaces coined by the
Mind cannot be incorporated or
assimilated into the physical space of
Nature as purporting to represent its
physical structure.
For
instance, the so-called Standard
Model of Quantum Mechanics
that employs, at its
mathematical
foundation,
Abelian
and non-Abelian groups,
cannot be used in representing Nature
as those
mathematical group structures do not
exist in the physical space of Nature.
They only exist and reside in a
mathematically
cultivated Mind
(MCM). In
short,
a mathematical result should
never ever be converted automatically
into a physical result
characterizing Nature without first
checking its mathematical
structural foundation. For
instance, the Matrix Math, as
interesting and beautiful as it may be,
has no place, as a foundation, in
TRUTON,
because no such a foundational
structure governs the space of
Nature.
As such, the corresponding Matrix
Mechanics that is a pillar of
Quantum
Mechanics
has no place whatsoever in
TRUTON
or in any other rational theory of
Nature (ratton).
TRUTON,at its core, is par excellence, a direct
outgrow from Classical Physics and its
followers initiated methodically by Galileo
Galilei and
Sir Isaac Newton.
Isaac
Newton
.
On
July 5, 1686, Sir Isaac Newton published
his seminal and revolutionary work entitled
Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia
Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of
Natural Philosophy) or in short
Principia. The object of Principia was to
establish in a rational fashion a "mechanical"
Universe where all motions studied to be able to
be derived from coherent mathematical-mechanical
principles. It was Newton
who first coined the term Rational Mechanics to
distinguish it from the study of Empiric
Mechanics.
Newton,
following into the steps of Copernicus,
Kepler, Galileo Galilei, and many others
preceding them, saw clearly the close and
profound interrelationship that existed between
Mathematics (in his case, the Euclidean
geometry) and Mechanics and how one draws from
another their own existence. In his Preface to
the First Edition of Principia,
Newton
noted (Principia, vol. I, Univ. of California
Press, 1966, pp. xvii-xviii):
"The
ancients considered mechanics in a twofold
respect; as rational, which proceeds
accurately by demonstration, and practical.
To practical mechanics all the manual arts
belong, from which mechanics took its name.
... To describe right lines and circles are
problems, but not geometrical problems. The
solutions to these problems is required from
mechanics, and by geometry the use of them,
when so solved, is shown; and it is the glory
of geometry that from those few principles,
brought from without, it is able to produce
so many things. Therefore geometry
is founded in mechanical practice, and is
nothing but that part of universal mechanics
which accurately proposes and demonstrates
the art of measuring. But since
the manual arts are chiefly employed in the
moving bodies, it happens that geometry is
commonly referred to their magnitude, and
mechanics to their motion. In this sense
rational mechanics will be the science of
motions resulting from any force whatsoever,
and of the forces required to produce any
motions, accurately proposed and
demonstrated. ....
I consider philosophy rather than arts and
write not concerning manual but natural
powers, and consider chiefly those things
which relate to gravity, levity, elastic
force, the resistance of fluids, and the like
forces, whether attractive or impulsive; and
therefore I offer this work as the mechanical
principles of philosophy, for the whole
burden of philosophy seems to consist in this
--from the phenomena of motions to
investigate the forces of nature,
and then from these forces to demonstrate the
other phenomena; and to this end the general
propositions in the first and second Books
are directed. In the third Book I give an
example of this in the explanation of the
System of the World; for by the propositions
mathematically demonstrated in the former
Books, in the third I derive from celestial
phenomena the forces of gravity which bodies
tend to the sun and the several planets. Then
from these forces, by other propositions
which are also mathematical, I deduce the
motions of planets, the comets, the moon, and
the sea." [Underline and underscore
supplied.]
Then,
recognizing the limitation of his work,
Newton
noted his disappointment in his Preface to
Principia (ibidem) with a glimpse at what
future theoretical work may be needed to unlock
the ultimate secrets of Nature (underscore
supplied):
"I
wish we could derive the rest of the
phenomena of Nature by the same kind of
reasoning from mechanical principles,
for I am induced by many reasons to
suspect that they may all depend upon certain
forces by which the particles of bodies, by
some cause hitherto unknown, are either
mutually impelled towards one another, and
cohere in regular figures, or are repelled
and recede from one another. These
forces being unknown, philosophers have
hitherto attempted the search of Nature in
vain; but I hope the principles here laid
down will afford some light either to this or
some truer method of philosophy."
And
at the end of his work,
Newton
clearly was disappointed of not being able to
discover the deepest interconnections that
govern Nature --from the origin of gravity to
the origin of other forces, (ibidem,
vol. II, pp. 546-54), as he
noted:
"Hitherto
we have explained the phenomena of the
heavens and of our sea by the power of
gravity, but we have not assigned
the cause of that power. This is
certain, that it must proceed from a cause
that penetrates to the very centers of the
sun and planets, without suffering the least
diminution of its force; that operates not
according to the quantity of the surfaces of
the particles upon which acts (as mechanical
causes used to do), but according to the
quantity of solid matter which they contain
and propagates its virtue on all sides to
immense distances, decreasing always as the
inverse square of the distance. ... .But
hitherto I have not been able to
discover the cause of those
properties, of gravity from
phenomena, and I frame no
hypotheses; (In the original Latin
that become famous, Hypotheses non
fingo)" [Emphasis
supplied.]
Because
of that impasse which continuously was present
and which was never been able to be overpassed
by all generations that followed
Newton,
it was in the end a path that was abandoned
altogether and replaced for the first time with
a novel path containing elements of the
irrational with countless of speculations over
speculations.
Indeed,
the foundation of Newton's
Mechanics (dubbed today as Classical Mechanics),
and which reigned supreme until the beginning of
the 20th century, was abandoned and replaced
first by Albert Einstein
through a so-called Relativistic mechanics
incorporating, in a novel fashion, irrational
thinking and elements of the absurd, as
follows:
1)
first time, in 1905 with the introduction of
his so-called Special Theory of
Relativity (where
Newton's
fundamental concepts of Space, Time and
Simultaneity were being challenged and mashed
up together into an absurd and meaningless
4-dimensional continuum called
spacetime where to the Euclidean
geometrical 3-dimensional Space, Time was
being added as the 4th dimension of the newly
created imaginary Space. If t is the
Time variable, and x, y, z are the
geometrical coordinates of a point, the
Euclidean Space
[x(t), y(t), z(t)] was
transformed into the meaningless
4-dimensional ad hoc imaginary Space
[x, y, z, t]. And that
ad hoc absurdity is being considered
today as being a revolution in viewing and
understanding Nature.
[sic!]
2)
the second time, some 10-11 years later, with
the introduction of
Einstein's
so-called General Theory of Relativity
purporting to be the theory of gravity
where the Space
itself,
Bernhard Riemann
called now the
spacetime, was postulated to
have out-of-the-blue a "curvature" of some
sort, of an unknown origin, residing outside
of the structural realm of Euclidean
geometry. Gravity
was now being "explained" through that
willy-nilly postulated curvature of the
spacetime.
Now, the 3-dimensional structural
Euclidean geometry of Space was replaced,
willy-nilly, with the higher-dimensional
structural geometry of the
Riemannian curved spaces purporting to
represent the true structural physical
Space of the Universe
(SOTU).
Once
the gates towards irrational were opened and
various structural imaginary mathematical
models were introduced that had nothing to do
with the reality and the physical world of
Nature they purported to represent, the
landscape of Physics has changed in a most
dramatic way. New irrational implants were able
now to find a fertile ground for
development.
Asides
from the Relativity theories, another
unrelated irrational non-Newtonian mechanics,
called Quantum Mechanics, that could be
renamed as A Hocus-Pocus Phantasmal
Mathematical
Theory Of the Absurd
(MathOA),
was born out of that "scientific" irrational
freedom pioneered by
Einstein.
Indeed,
that Quantum
Mechanics theory
was founded on massive speculations,
aberrations of logic, lack of common sense,
and based on a nonsensical spatial
structural
foundation
which were wrapped up into beautiful and
elegant Mathematics that has had no rational
justification for being associated with it,
in the description and the representation of
Nature. In fact, Richard Feynman --the
1965 Physics Nobel Laureate was not joking
when he noted
that:
Since
the rational thinking was no longer a
prerequisite in explaining Nature in the new
"modern" Physics and, since the irrational
arguments were gaining tacit acceptance more and
more through the pioneering of
Einstein's
Relativistic mechanics and followed by the birth
of a new novel mechanics --the Quantum
mechanics, a new illogical speculative
"scientific" climate was able to emerge with
Physics at its forefront followed closely by
Cosmology that subsequently spilled
further into Chemistry.
In
the "new" Physics, more than in any other
Natural Science, willy-nilly hocus-pocus
advanced Mathematics, with no an iota of
justification, began to cover a vast amount of
physical speculations creating in the end
elaborate advanced mathematical theories of
entirely speculative nature. Those speculative
results, in a way, became seductive because of
the beauty of the language of Mathematics that
was able to describe them.
The Physics and Cosmology part of
TRUTON, of course, can
considerably be enhanced and beautified
with expressing those results in the
beautiful language provided by
Mathematics as outlined in here
below:
If
TRUTON is designed to be the
exclusive theory of Nature, then
that representation must be
independent of our sense perceptions
and, in particular, to be able to
make sense for born blind people!
How we, the humans, see and perceive
our environment, as interesting as
it may be, is not part of a true
rational
theory of Nature
(ratton).
The
Theory of Sense Perception
(TOSP) as interesting as it may
be, lies outside of the realm of
Physics as its results need not
depend of how the humans or other
livings perceive their surroundings
in various conditions or
circumstances.
For
instance, at best,
Einstein's
Special Theory of
Relativity, is par
excellence, a theory of
sense perception
(TOSP)
and thus, it needs to
reside outside of the realm
of
Physics!
In TRUTON all forces and
concepts of Nature are real and not
fictional and, its results should
never ever be derived from our
sense perceptions (senpers)
of how we see or perceive certain
physical phenomena from different
systems of references or systems of
coordinate or other particular
conditions.
Based on the fundamental principle
of TRUTON, that all its
results must be independent from any
particular coordinate system, the
question that arises is what model
would be acceptable in here and what
Mathematics should be
used.
Well,
the Mathematics employed in
Continuum Mechanics (known
also as The Rational
Mechanics) is the mathematical
model most suited for TRUTON
where the Tensor Calculus
(and Tensor Analysis, in
general) represents its mathematical
backbone since a tensor in
Mathematics has an existence
independent of any particular
coordinate system.
Physical
laws when expressed, as in
Continuum
Mechanics,
by tensor equations are
universal in the sense that if they
are valid in one coordinate system,
then they are valid in any
other coordinate system. That beauty
of invariance of tensor equations,
regardless of the coordinate system
employed, makes that tensor approach
universal in a theory of Nature.
As such,
The
mathematical
blueprint
and formalization of TRUTON
for its Physics and
Cosmology parts must be the
one vested in the
tensorial
approach
as it is currently employed
in the advanced
Continuum
Mechanicscemented
by the late Johns Hopkins
University professor
Clifford Truesdell and his
disciples (most notably by
his student, the late
Carnegie Mellon University
professor Walter
Noll).
C. Truesdell
As the irrational method of "explaining" things
has gradually entered into the mainstream
theories of Nature, creating the body of The
Irrational Physical Theory Of Nature
(TIPTON), it was not long before
cosmologists began entertaining out-of-the-blue
speculative concepts as the invisible
dark matter, dark energy, black holes, and so
on, as being "ingredients" of our Universe. A
glimpse into how in TRUTON those
speculative dark matter and dark energy concepts
are being treated is provided below:
In
TRUTON,
as we shall see, the speculative
concept of
dark
matter
is going to get a new face-lift, as we
will discover the existence of the
elusive particles (ELPAs) whose
surfaces are made of the same material
as their environmental
medium.
Those
ELPAswill give rise to the concept of an
elusive matter (elma) whose
existence is being exposed in
here.
that
never happened
The
Universe itself, nowadays is being speculated as
being originated somehow from a point of
infinite density and temperature that somehow
began expanding and continue to expand. Such a
postulated origin of the Universe defies all
logic, all common sense, and most importantly
all Physics --as Physics (as oppose to
Mathematics) does not allow infinite parameters
into its arsenal. All physical parameters of
Nature are finite indeed.
Troubling
questions, that could have triggered an alarm,
such as how a point of infinite density and
temperature could have been formed in the first
place, that is in a blatant defiance to all
Physics and its concepts of describing Nature,
did not stop the Big-Bang Cosmology to
became the dominant cosmology of nowadays.
God, if there is one, surely is having a
field day in seeing how far off the current
physical science has deviated from the rational
understanding of the Universe's actual origin,
formation and evolution.
For
an analysis (outside of TRUTON)
refuting the
Big
Bang
Cosmology,
see Paul
Marmet's
paper "Big
Bang Cosmology Meets an Astronomical
Death"
<https:newtonphysics.on.ca/bigbang/index.html>
With this being said, before going any further,
we may want to provide a glimpse into
TRUTON's own cosmological model as
follows:
Nature's
Ultimate Cycles
In TRUTON, the willy-nilly lunatic
Big-Bang cosmological model is being
replaced with the cosmological model
based on the
ultimate
grand everlasting cycles (UGECs)
of
Nature's spinning megastructures
--the
spinoverses (SPIVs)
that
are being formed through various
collisions,
with our Universe being one such
SPIV.
A
breaking spinoverse surrounded
by absolute
vacuum.
.Those
spinoverses
(SPIVs),
whose spin, by
collisions,
can only increase with time (because
their axes
of spin
--AOS
are not fixed and thus can rotate
freely in space and, as such, an
AOS
rotation of an 180 degrees will result
in a change in the spin's direction),
will ultimately reach a finite
critical upper limit of spin's
magnitude. A
spinoverse
(SPIV)
reaching that spin limit of rotation
will break up with its remnant parts
flying apart radially. .Those
remnant flying parts in the surrounding
vacuum will decompress and transform
themselves into stable base level
entities, to be identified later, that
now continue with their radial gliding
linear motions. They now have became
the seeds for the creation
(through
collisions and accretions with other
remnant parts of other disintegrative
spinoverses)
of new spinning
megastructures, i.e., of
newspinoverses
(SPIVs). .The
spinoverse
cycles of formation and
self-destruction --the
UGECs
are able thus to exist in perpetuity.
Thus, Nature does not have a beginning
nor an end of existence --being, as
such, a given eternal entity, as
oppose to its
spinoverses
(aka, its
universes)
that all possess a finite life of
existence with a beginning and an end,
being thus entities derived all
from the eternal Nature.
While Nature is unlimited both in its
existence and dimension, its created
spinoverses
(aka, its
universes)
are not: they are all limited in their
existence and extent.
Moving
on, we now note that the novelty of the new
"modern" Physics is vested in its ability to
place, side by side, the irrational with the
rational and mash up them together,
indistinguishably, through an advanced
mathematical format that looks very "scientific"
at a very high level. As long as that "modern"
setting is allowed to exist, peppered with
elements of the irrational and limitless
speculations, Natural Sciences are indeed at a
very great peril. A beautiful seductive
Mathematics should never ever be allowed to
replace, or to be a camouflage for, the missing
Physics in deciphering the secrets of Nature.
And that is because an "arbitrary" Mathematics
can be associated easily with concepts and
assumptions that have nothing, but absolutely
nothing, in common with the reality of
Nature and its modus operandi.
The
flood of speculations, that continued unabated
in the "new" Physics, have proliferated sadly
into all Natural Sciences. From the many
examples that could be given, we could mention
for instance the ludicrous speculation
responsible for the mass extinction of the
dinosaur some 65 million years ago as a result
of some catastrophic cosmic event generated by
the collision of our planet with some real or
imaginary meteor.
[As
we shall see, the mass extinction of
the dinosaur with ease can be explained
through rational
arguments
--not as an accident, but as a
necessity-- derived from
Evolutionary Biology.
Unfortunately,
using the same rational arguments, we
get the same inescapable foregone
conclusion that a mass extinction is in
order for the human species, for other
certain species of terrestrial animals
and birds, as well as, for some other
forms of terrestrial life. That
futuristic mass extinction
process,
that now has entered into its
"strangulation" phase, is currently
advancing at an alarming accelerated
pace! More on
that,
and other related subjects are posted
in our Evolutionary Biology
(EB)
section.]
The
new "modern" field of speculations over
speculations has created indeed an extremely
fertile terrain for writing "scientific"
speculative papers and books --all masked under
the elegant costumes of advanced Mathematics
that it was employed with not one iota of
justification for its use.
Charos
Club
Everybody
appeared to be happy of the newly found
bottomless speculative reservoir: the
universities and other research
institutions were delighted of the new
found wealth of papers and books that
their members were able to produce as
that wealth was able to justify to the
society (which has been footing the
bill) of the necessity of continuing
with the ever increasing funding. They
become the "modern" charlatans of
science (charos), whose Club --the
Charos Club (CC) dominates now
the current academic landscape of
Physics.
Charlatans
Of Science
(Charos)
.
C
A R T E L
.
Similar
to a "Mafia" Club, the "capos" of
the created Charos
Club (CC)
devised
a protective shield (prosh) from its
visibility to the rest of the society, most
difficult to be recognized much less to be
penetrated, vested in an advanced gibberish
mathematical shield (Gibmash), and posted
prominently at its entrance. That
Gibmash,
designed to cover the
Club's
nonsensical theories of Nature, is posted for
camouflage and intimidation purposes to be
viewed by all passing students and other novice
visitors at large.
or
This
new breed of scientists (called the
gibbers or the shammers)
of the created Gibberish (Gibb)
or Sham Physics are now
encroaching the entire landscape of
Physics. My goodness, what a science
travesty of an unimaginable twist we
are witnessing and witnessed for the
past 100 years...
Isaac
Newton and his followers would have
rolled over their grave to have seen
how degenerated the new Physics has
became being totally disfigured by the
massive peppering with irrational
out-of-blue speculations over
speculations covered with high-end
Mathematics, to look scientific, and
difficult to be discerned...
Big-Bang
theory of the Universe,
Einstein's Relativity
theories, spacetime continuum,
Time
dilation/contaction,
Quantum Standard Model,
Quantum gravity,
Quarks/Antiquarks,
muon, tau, and
other elementary particles
(leptons, antileptons, gouge
bosons, Higgs bosons, gluons,
and many more), dark
matter, dark energy and so on,
are all irrational speculative
concepts introduced ad
hoc to "explain" Natureconsidered to be an
absurd
entity to begin with, for
crying out loud!
Gibb-Physics
or
Sham-Physics
Arguably,
today's Charos
Club (CC)
can
be viewed as some sort of a science
masquerade cartel (SMC) that, for
Particle Physics, could very well be
called the TAU TAU Quantum Cartel
(taken from the bogus tau particle of
Quantum Machanics).
The
most common and visible protective
shield (prosh),
that is being posted by the Charos
Club (CC)
towards the novice visitors
entering its premises, is the
permanent posting at its
"entrance"
--for
intimidation
purposes--
typically in the form of a blackboard,
some advanced
gibberish
mathematics
(gibmath)that no outsider could possibly
grasp, as illustrated herein by that of
the popular peddler for the
"new"
particle Physics
(NPP),
Brian Greene of Columbia
University, USA (posted
below)
or by that of the much
cited Lisa Randall of Harvard
University, USA (posted in
here).
With that intimidatinggibmathpermanent posting, the
Gibmash
set-up is complete being indeed
foolproof !
Brian Greene
Brian
Greene's
sample
of
a typical
set-up
"shield"
placed in
front of the
visiting
novice
newcomers...
The
mandatory
Ricci
tensor
(renamed in
Physics as
the Einstein
tensor)
is well
embedded
in there...
Today,
Physics
without
Einstein is
like having
Religion
without
God...
BTW,All
members of the
Charos
Club (CC),
with
no
exception,
appear to have one basic
commonality:they
all appear indeed to be
very
manipulative and quite dishonest
leading to creating total
indoctrination.And,
that indocrination,
particularly for the
newcomer
students
(newstuds),
begins via a "reeducation" program of
controlling the Mind's inferences by
injecting in it
anamalgamof
speculative, illusionary, circular and
irrational reasoning mushed up together
with aberrations of logic and distorted
unrelated analogies reaching the level
of the
absurd!
(That
nonsensical mushed amalgam, as
noted, is being infused with
some gibberish
incomprehensible advanced
mathematics to appear to the
novice as being highly
scientific in nature. The end
result of all that is the
incorporation of high-level
gibberish,
nonsensical, incoherent
talk
that appears to be a
trademark, most notable, for
the elite luminary members of
CC.)
If
someone from the TAU TAU
Quantum
Cartel
is being accused or challenged with
propagating
irrationality,
then that is simply explained by
declaring that
theMinditself
is just obeying the laws of
Quantum
Physics
revealing, as such, the
"absurdity"
of Nature
[sic!]...
.
.Arguably,
the indoctrination
taking place in the
Particle
Physics (PP) Cult
is
no different, in
essance, than that of
a
Holy
Religious (HR)
Cult.
And that is because
at their substratum,
they both have one
common
denominator:
their
Irrationality.
The indoctrinated
members of a
PP
Cult
and the ones of a
HR
Cult
appear indeed to look
and act quite the
same (pictures
below)...
There
are a number of ways to be successful
in
indoctrination. A
glimpse into the manipulative method of
indoctrination is outlined
below.
PS>
Very often that false
reality is amplified by
the media
which is sucked in by the
science bait
-announcements. .
In
the search of the eternal and
elusive
"truth": No
one from either Cult, under
the mantra of "reaching the
truth,” has
any idea what they are
actually acclaiming or
praising.
As
in the case of "Mafia's soldiers," the work of
those nowadays scientists appears to be
legitimate through the cultivation of illusions
which have not an iota of rationality in them
and which, are being trumpeted to represent the
course of the new, modern Physics.
To
quote again Richard Feynman,the
reason the new Physics had to take a turn
towards the Absurd was because Nature itself
happens to beabsurd"
[sic!]:
"Quantum
mechanics describe Nature as absurd
from the point of view of common
sense.
And yet it fully agrees with the
experiment.
So, I hope you can accept Nature as She
is --absurd."
[sic!]
From
Richard Feynman's book
"The Strange Theory of Light and
Matter," Princeton University Press,
1988, p. 10:
Sorry,
the only thing that is being
accepted in TRUTON as
being absurd
is that
Quantum
Mechanics
is par excellence a
Theory of the Absurd...
And,
we indeed, subscribe
to the
characterization of
the
Oxford Emeritus
Physics Professor,
Sir Roger
Penrose
FRS who was quoted as
saying: "Quantum mechanics
makes absolutely no
sense."
As such, that new Physics Of The Absurd
(POTA), covered by an impenetrable mantle
provided by an advanced ad-hoc gibberish
Mathematics, is being peddled to the society at
large, as serving to the advancement and/or the
interests of Natural Sciences and thus, as
serving to the society at large.
The
reality of POTA
however is sadly
different:
Speculative,
irrational work, wrapped in fancy
advanced arbitrary Mathematics,
is perhaps great for its "academic"
glorification, but it has no place
whatsoever into the body or development
of Natural Sciences, in general, and of
Physics, in particular. The plague of
that massive irrational speculative
work that now has engulfed the entire
"modern" Physics needs to be eradicated
in its totality if Physics and thus
Natural Sciences can truly be further
advanced.
The
indoctrination of the new students in
Physics with POTA
has been essential for POTA's
survivability. It has been articulated
as follows by the noted renown Physics
Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman:
It
is time long overdue to begin cleaning
our house and dispose of
POTA
--that cumulated academic garbage
entity and remembering Max
Planck's
poignant words:
We make no mistake on the urgency of
the cleaning and disposal of that
POTA's
foundation !
A
Grave LIGO
conCERN
big-time
science con artists of the
"new"
Physics...
How
more absurd or repugnant this
picture from CERN could
be? Bottles
of champagne and hard liquor
are part of CERN's Control
Room decor!
Fabricated milestones are
celebrated there with bottles
of champagne that are labeled
accordingly.
Handy perhaps, for celebrating
fabricated staged discoveries
or for being able to
see what one want to
see...
But not to worry, the society
at large is footing the bill
for all that massive
orchestrated charade and
charlatanry!
Nothing, but absolutely
nothing, has advanced our
understanding of the atomic
and subatomic worlds from the
CERN, FERMILAB or
LIGO experiments.
The
experimental part of the "new" Physics
that currently exists
[be
it for instance, at
CERN(say,
with the much publicized
discovery of the fictional
elusive particle purporting
to be responsible for
the "origin of mass"
[sic!]
of subatomic particles
(whatever that
nonsensical endeavor is
presumed to be)
i.e., of the
discovery of the so-called
speculative Higgs
boson),
or
at
FERMILAB,
or
at the LIGOLabs(with
the purported discovery of
the Cosmic Gravitational
Wave which is a
monumental costly
orchestrated
hoax),
or
at any other
multi-million/billion
dollar project of the "new"
experimental
Physics/Astronomy, such as
the $10 billion
JamesWebb Space
Telescope of ZERO
scientific value by
detecting a number of
previously unknown galaxies
out of the millions still
undetected.
For
more detail of the
worthlessness of that
costly astronomical project
click in here.]
A costly
Webb Telescope image.
is made up of mostly fabricated
imaginary
"discoveries" providing, at
best,pseudoscience results
(which never ever needs to be confused
with the real science) and, at
worst,fraudulent results
gained from plain deceit. The
bogus experimental data received from
the "new" experimental Physics is no
accident and, that is because the
theory behind that data, which is
always preconceived, is flawed at its
very foundation. Indeed, the
foundation of Quantum Mechanics,
the foundation of
Einstein's
theory of gravity, of space and time,
of Relativity, the speculative
out-of-the-blue foundation of
the Big-Bang cosmological theory or of
the speculative existence of
Black Holes --all are flawed
foundations out of which we can get
only flawed preconceived results. All
those willy-nilly foundations and
representations do no exist in Nature,
but only exist in a deformed
speculative imagination of
Nature that a Mind can phantom to
exist.
The April 2019 frenzy,
triggered from the consensus
of a group of astronomers'
pronouncement of being able to
capture the first image of a
purported
Black
Hole,
is the latest fabricated
example of a spectacular
hoax
that has being promulgated
worldwide.
Natural Sciences in general,
and Astronomy and Physics in
particular, are indeed in
great peril with the
proliferation of the
speculative concocted
hoaxes
that now pollute the purity of
science, at its very core of
existence. Out of those
hoaxes,
a new type of "science" is in
the making:
the
hoaxology. The
purported
Black
Hole
is nothing but a cosmic
Black
Hoaxthat
belongs into the realm of
hoaxology!
Black Holes
do not exist in Nature, they
only exist in our deformed
imagination of Nature whose
theoretical foundation was
derived from
Einstein's
lunatic theory of Space and
Time with its nonsensical
spacetime
concept
of General Relativity.
The picture
purporting to be a
Black
Hole
is not in fact an
actual physical
picture (i.e., is not
a "photo"), but is
the simulated image
obtained from a
computer imaging
algoritm that
generates petabytes
of radio telescope
data on a general
relativistic
model.
Thus,
the claim that the
computerized
Black
Hole
image obtained
represents another
proof of confirming
the validity of
Einstein's
General Relativity is
fallacious as it is
based on circular
reasoning or circular
logic.
Indeed,
that
orchestrated
cosmic
hoax
started with
creating an
algorithm
based on the
existence of
Einstein's
General
Relativity
and ended up
with a
simulated
computerized
image
purported to
confirm the
validity of
that
spacetime
relativistic
theory of
Einstein
[sic!].
As
such,
the circular
argument is
complete: we
ended up
where we
started! The
components
of a
circular
argument are
logically
valid
because if
the premise
is true, the
conclusion
is also
true!
A
purported
Black Hole
From particle accelerations or
colliders, we never ever could gain
anything that could advance our
understanding of the nano-world of
Nature. And that, as we shall see in
the next
section,
is because of Heisenberg'sObservational
Indeterminacy Principle
(HOIP)
dubbed today, incorrectly, as
Heisenberg's principle of the
"observer
uncertainty
effect."
[Originally,
Heisenberg
used the word
"ungenauigkeit"
("indeterminacy") to
describe his
observational-impasse
recognition that in the
English-language version,
incorrectly, was translated as
"uncertainty" and
which, later, was transformed
into a new and different form
and type of
"observer
uncertainty
effect"
known today as
Heisenberg's
Uncertainty Principle
(HUP).]
.
Life is good at
FermiLab...
From the speculative cosmological
Big-Bang phenomenon or the purported
imaginary Black Holes that do not exist
in Nature, but exist only in our own
twisted imagination, we can make
elaborate and costly experiments (such
as the ones from
CERN,
FERMILAB,
or LIGO
Labs)
and claim, in the end, to be a
confirmation of whatever the sought
result we want to get. However, to dupe
the society which is footing the bill
of billions and billions of dollars in
the name of "science" for those
speculative mega-projects that lack an
iota of rationality in them, is indeed
criminal and repugnant to the core of
our entire civilization --and that,
cannot go on, and on,
unabated.
That global academic
science
masquerade cartel (SMC),
that has been in existence for quite some time,
cannot go on and on indefinitely. There should
be a time when that wide spread academic
charade, upon exposure, will have to come to an
end.
Abraham
Lincoln
As such, and in response to
SMC,at
our "trutonian" door, for the adherent members
of the introduced Particle
Physics (PP)
Cult,we
have placed this posting paraphrased from the
one coined some two centuries ago by Abraham
Lincoln, the 16th President of the United
States:
"You
canfool
some of the people some
of the time, you
can
even fool some of the people
all the time, but
you cannot fool
all the people all the
time."
Moving on, from Particle Physics, the bottom-end
frontier of Physics --the mother of all Natural
Sciences, there is absolutely no evidence that
our understanding of Nature has been enhanced at
all, neither with the advent of
a)
Quantum Mechanics nor with that of
b)Einstein's
Relativity theories.
Indeed,
!
a)
Basic, fundamental questions expected
to be elucidated in Quantum Mechanics
are to this day completely ignored and
left literally in the dark... For
instance, upon the discovery of the
Electron and the Proton, to this very
day, there is no understanding as to
WHY the Electron and the Proton have
electric charges in the first place,
nor is there an understanding as to WHY
those respective charges are
exactly equal in magnitude.
.Also,
there is no existing explanation as to
WHY the negative charge is being
associated to the Electron --as a
negative quantity usually represents a
deficit of some sort, nor is there a
rationality as to WHY to the Proton it
was associated a positive charge --as a
positive quantity is usually associated
to a surplus of some sort.
In
fact, those arbitrary
ad-hoc charges
attributed to the Electron and
Proton happen to be the
correct ones. A crude
explanation as to WHY that is
so, is provided succinctly
below:
.The
Electron's
core, as we shall
see, is a
permanentenergy "peak."
Its created
permanent
surrounding
charge, as we
shall see, is
lowering the
electron's global
energy level to the
level of its
surrounding
environment and, as
such, is being
represented as a
negative
charge.
.The
Proton's core,
on the other hand, as
we shall see again,
is a permanentenergy "hole"
that
intermittently
is able to
acquire a
charge capable
intermittently
to elevate its energy
level to reach the
bottom energy level
of its environment.
Because of that
elevating capability
of that acquired
charge, we associate
to it the
positive
sign.
With the recognition
that the
Proton is a
permanent
energy "hole," the
explanation of
Newton's
ordinary
gravity is, as
we shall see, rather
straightforward!
.
M.
Planck
Asides
from generating the
gravitational
field, as we also
shall see, the
Protonintermittently
emanates a radiant
energy cementing
thus Max
Planck's
monumental
recognition that the
energy
radiation is not
continuous, but is
"punctuated" through
"packets" of
energy that
eventually become to
be called as
"quanta" of
energy.
Continuing
with the state of the current
Physics,
WHAT an electric charge actually
is,
besides being a "property" of
matter?, or HOW and WHERE those
particles store and carry their
respective electric charges? --are
examples of some basic fundamental
questions that today are not even being
asked, much less entertained, in that
truly repugnant Quantum
Mechanics.
No
Mathematics indeed can fill up or mask
that void of knowledge! The naked
ignorance is there, in plain sight, as
no mathematical shield is able to be
found in Quantum Mechanics to cover
that profound gap of knowledge, from
the many, that currently
exist.
!
FESTINA
LENTE ("HURRY SLOWLY")
.
b)
Contrary to the current existing
prevailing view, there is nothing, but
absolutely nothing out there, at the
macro level, that could dethrone the
Newtonian Mechanics and replace it
with, say,
Einstein's
General Theory of Relativity (GTR), or
with anything else. Indeed, for
instance, the two major observational
tests attributed to support
Einstein's
GTR were
1)
one, with respect to
explaining the peculiar
perihelion precession of
Mercury's orbit, and 2)
the other, with respect to
predicting the deflection of
light by the Sun
which,
as
to be seen, can be explained
with ease from the principle
of Classical Physics
developed in TRUTON and
nothing else.
1'.
The fundamental error that exists in
Einstein's
GTR, when dealing with the perihelion
precession of Mercury's orbit, is that
there, the
Sun
is being considered to be a homogeneous
spherical mass which in reality it is
not.
Today,
we know that the
Sun's
mass and distribution is far from being
homogeneous, being in fact of an
enormous complex structure --that of a
hot non-homogeneous plasma interwoven
with magnetic fields. To this, if we
add a recent observational finding and
recognition that the Sun is not quite
spherical, as its poles are flattened,
then we begin to appreciate that the
anomalies of Mercury's orbit are a
direct reflection of that physical
complex reality of the Sun, and nothing
else.
All that was first recognized in April
1982,
at the University of Arizona, USA, by
Professor Henry A. Hill in
collaboration with Dr. Philip R.
Goode and the graduate student
Randall J. Bos and, reported by
Hill
of those results before the Royal
Astronomical Society of Dublin.
(See also this
referenced article.)
2'.
The deflection of
light
by the Sun
(or by any other massive mass) is being
explained not out of
Einstein's
lunatic spacetime theory of
gravity, but is explained
herein
from TRUTON's theory of gravity
derived from the principles of
Classical Physics.
Yes, as you perhaps may have guessed, it is the
aim of TRUTON not only to eliminate and
pulverize those two irrational implants
--Quantum
Mechanics
and Relativity,
but also to restore and continue the long
standing rational path of Physics formalized by
Isaac
Newton
and its followers.
What
was wrong, one may ask, with
Newton's
method of discovering "things" in Nature and,
why with his approach which was so
adequate in so many respects, we could not
"descend" and "see" the cause of existence of
various phenomena that govern Nature such as
gravity or "see" the cause of all other
interactions that govern Nature's particle
world?
!
Well, it is
perhaps important to answer to that,
right here and right now, with noting
that the primary propositions or axioms
which Newton
has chosen in building up his
rational
theory of Nature (ratton)
were limited in two (2) major
areas:
i)
one,
that they were placed much too
"high up" in the evolutionary
ladder of Nature and thus,
from there no one could
"descend" below the base
platform of his axioms and
primary propositions;
and ii)
the
other, that they were
primarily channeled concerning
the state of motion
through his famous
three (3) Laws (or
Axioms) of Motion
(enunciated in his
seminal Principia)
leaving aside the state
of matter --the other
indispensable primary
ingredient of Nature as, first
perhaps, recognized by
Immanuel Kant in his
Cosmolgy("Universal Natural History
and Theory Of
Heavens").
I. Kant
Now, as noted (in point i),
since from a given set of axioms, one
can go only upwards in a meaningful
way, the "level" of those axioms were
clearly far above the atomic and
subatomic world and hence, from that
starting point it was impossible to
tackle the world "below."
In
addition, as noted (in point
ii), because the state of
primal matter was left and set
aside by Newton,
that made it quite impossible, with
Newton'sratton,
to tackle the material world "below"
that is ultimately responsible for
all material interactions that
govern Nature.
That
last recognition of the foundational
role of the
primal
matter
and primal motion is truly
pivotal for TRUTON. Indeed,
here, in TRUTON, we shall begin
our journey from the absolute
"bottom-line" level of
matter
and
motion
(mamo)
from where there will be no "below" or
"underneath" to consider. Then, from
that absolute "bottom" line of Nature,
we shall, exactly as in Mathematics,
build up the entire theory of Nature,
our TRUTON. Clearly, by building
TRUTON from the "bottom" up, we
shall expect that some (if not all) of
Newton's
axioms or laws of motion to be
incorporated and integrated into the
foundation of TRUTON.
It
is also important to note that while
Newton
clearly had indicated in Principia's
Preface (see the underlined text
above)
the reason why he chose the Euclidean
geometry as theMathematics
capable of describing the forces and phenomena
of Nature, in the new "modern" Physics the
justification for abandoning the
Euclidean
space is
no longer present.
Indeed,
Einstein
and their followers and those embracing
the Quantum mechanics, never ever were
able to provide a justification for
their ad hoc "arbitrary"
Mathematics employed except to say
that with such departure "it works!"
[sic!] meaning that we
can write a lot of ad hoc papers
containing a lot of beautiful
Mathematics.
Finally,
let us note one more time that throughout the
entire history of Physics and for that matter of
the rest of Natural Sciences, the direction of
theoretical work was done, if you will,
"inwards" through a top-down
approach:
we
started with the result (provided by
observations or experiments) and
went "inwards" attempting to find an
explanation for the result
obtained.
In
Mathematics, as we have noted, the
method of obtaining its results has
been exactly opposite being, if you
will, in the "outwards" direction
through a bottom-up
approach:
You start with
certain primary propositions called
axioms beyond which there are no more
meaningful inquiries to be made and
then, you work your way "up" deriving
results which are build up from the
previous results and so on.
It
is this bottom-up "outwards"
path from the ground up that we shall
attempt to initiate as the new road or
path and direction of studying Nature
--a path that may be called the
trutonian (or the
trutonic) path or the
trutonic road
(truroad).
To travel with us on our
trutonian/trutonicascendent
bottom-up
road,
you need not have any special
mathematical training because the
principles of TRUTON can be
understood from reasoning derived from
physical considerations
alone.
The
backbone of TRUTON is
causality,
i.e., the big WHY.
In TRUTON, causality that needs to be of
a physical and not mathematical in nature, is
its centerpiece. Describing Nature without its
physical casuality is not acceptable in
TRUTON. For example, in TRUTON
talking and describing gravity without
knowing its cause and origin of existence is not
an acceptable form of presentation.
In
other words, the descriptive approach without
causality
in presenting Nature is not the approach that
TRUTON will embrace. As
Immanuel
Kantso eloquently put it,
"Causality
is the basis of all scientific work.
Causality is the condition that renders
science possible."
Because of that causality
"skeleton" of TRUTON that is physical and
not mathematical in nature, special mathematical
training or skills are nor required in here.
In TRUTON, causality and origin of
phenomena will always be of a physical
nature, and never ever, be of a
mathematical one as in the
hocus-pocus Quantum
Mechanics or as in the lunatic
Einstein's
theory of Special and General
Relativity!
Finally,
the Mathematics
that can be applied to TRUTON'sblueprint can give rise indeed
to a beautiful theoretical "body" whose
elegance and beauty only Mathematics
can provide.
But
before one can dress TRUTON with
elegant garments provided by
Mathematics, we need first to know what
we are dressing up and, making sure
that this is the body that we want to
dress,for crying out
loud.
It
is the purpose and scope of this work to
establish the blueprint for a
rational foundation of understanding Nature from
one single principle, law, cause, or "logic" of
operation. The method employed here, never used
before in the form presented herein, is modeled
from the skeleton
of Mathematics
(som+)
where we start with certain primary
propositions, called axioms, and then using
rational thinking --and only rational deductive
thinking-- an entire bottom-up theory is
build up.
and
cannot lead to rational contradictory
results), in TRUTON,
those primary propositions, in
addition, must have physical roots and
connotations that cannot "offend" our
given common sense (comsen).
That addition
(+)
in 
Our
modeled 
Asides
from the mathematical Euclidean
space that emulates the natural
structural physical space of
Nature, the plethora of other imaginary
mathematical spaces coined by the
Mind cannot be incorporated or
assimilated into the physical space of
Nature as purporting to represent its
physical structure.
For
instance, the so-called Standard
Model of Quantum Mechanics
that employs, at its
mathematical
foundation,
Abelian
and non-Abelian groups,
cannot be used in representing Nature
as those
mathematical group structures do not
exist in the physical space of Nature.
They only exist and reside in a
mathematically
cultivated Mind
(MCM).
In
short,
a mathematical result should
never ever be converted automatically
into a physical result
characterizing Nature without first
checking its mathematical
structural foundation. For
instance, the Matrix Math, as
interesting and beautiful as it may be,
has no place, as a foundation, in
TRUTON,
because no such a foundational
structure governs the space of
Nature.
Bernhard Riemann
Gravity
was now being "explained" through that
willy-nilly postulated curvature of the
spacetime.
Now, the 3-dimensional structural
Euclidean geometry of Space was replaced,
willy-nilly, with the higher-dimensional
structural geometry of the
Riemannian curved spaces purporting to
represent the true structural physical
Space of the Universe
(SOTU).
Asides
from the Relativity theories, another
unrelated irrational non-Newtonian mechanics,
called Quantum Mechanics, that could be
renamed as A Hocus-Pocus Phantasmal
Mathematical
Theory Of the Absurd
(MathOA),
was born out of that "scientific" irrational
freedom pioneered by
Einstein.
If
TRUTON is designed to be the
exclusive theory of Nature, then
that representation must be
independent of our sense perceptions
and, in particular, to be able to
make sense for born blind people!
How we, the humans, see and perceive
our environment, as interesting as
it may be, is not part of a true
rational
theory of Nature
(
In TRUTON all forces and
concepts of Nature are real and not
fictional and, its results should
never ever be derived from our
sense perceptions (senpers)
of how we see or perceive certain
physical phenomena from different
systems of references or systems of
coordinate or other particular
conditions.
As the irrational method of "explaining" things
has gradually entered into the mainstream
theories of Nature, creating the body of The
Irrational Physical Theory Of Nature
(TIPTON), it was not long before
cosmologists began entertaining out-of-the-blue
speculative concepts as the invisible
dark matter, dark energy, black holes, and so
on, as being "ingredients" of our Universe. A
glimpse into how in TRUTON those
speculative dark matter and dark energy concepts
are being treated is provided below:
In
TRUTON,
as we shall see, the speculative
concept of
dark
matter
is going to get a new face-lift, as we
will discover the existence of the
elusive particles (ELPAs) whose
surfaces are made of the same material
as their environmental
medium.
With this being said, before going any further,
we may want to provide a glimpse into
TRUTON's own cosmological model as
follows:
In TRUTON, the willy-nilly lunatic
Big-Bang cosmological model is being
replaced with the cosmological model
based on the
ultimate
grand everlasting cycles (UGECs)
of
Nature's spinning megastructures
--the
spinoverses (SPIVs)
that
are being formed through various
collisions,
with our Universe being one such
SPIV.
.The
spinoverse
cycles of formation and
self-destruction --the
[As
we shall see, the mass extinction of
the dinosaur with ease can be explained
through 
Charlatans
Of
. 
The
reality of 
The
bogus experimental data received from
the "new" experimental Physics is no
accident and, that is because the
theory behind that data, which is
always preconceived, is flawed at its
very foundation. Indeed, the
foundation of Quantum Mechanics,
the foundation of
Einstein's
theory of gravity, of space and time,
of Relativity, the speculative
out-of-the-blue foundation of
the Big-Bang cosmological theory or of
the speculative existence of
Black Holes --all are flawed
foundations out of which we can get
only flawed preconceived results. All
those willy-nilly foundations and
representations do no exist in Nature,
but only exist in a deformed
speculative imagination of
Nature that a Mind can phantom to
exist.
From particle accelerations or
colliders, we never ever could gain
anything that could advance our
understanding of the nano-world of
Nature. And that, as we shall see in
the 
[Originally,
Heisenberg
used the word
"ungenauigkeit"
("indeterminacy") to
describe his
observational-impasse
recognition that in the
English-language version,
incorrectly, was translated as
"uncertainty" and
which, later, was transformed
into a new and different form
and type of
"observer
uncertainty
effect"
known today as
Heisenberg's
Uncertainty Principle
(HUP).]
End
of conCERN
Moving on, from Particle Physics, the bottom-end
frontier of Physics --the mother of all Natural
Sciences, there is absolutely no evidence that
our understanding of Nature has been enhanced at
all, neither with the advent of
a)
Quantum Mechanics nor with that of
b)
Einstein's
Relativity theories.
Indeed,
What
was wrong, one may ask, with
Newton's
method of discovering "things" in Nature and,
why with his approach which was so
adequate in so many respects, we could not
"descend" and "see" the cause of existence of
various phenomena that govern Nature such as
gravity or "see" the cause of all other
interactions that govern Nature's particle
world?
I. Kant
That
last recognition of the foundational
role of the
primal
matter
and primal motion is truly
pivotal for TRUTON. Indeed,
here, in TRUTON, we shall begin
our journey from the absolute
"bottom-line" level of
matter
and
motion
(mamo)
from where there will be no "below" or
"underneath" to consider. Then, from
that absolute "bottom" line of Nature,
we shall, exactly as in Mathematics,
build up the entire theory of Nature,
our TRUTON. Clearly, by building
TRUTON from the "bottom" up, we
shall expect that some (if not all) of
Newton's
axioms or laws of motion to be
incorporated and integrated into the
foundation of TRUTON.
Finally,
let us note one more time that throughout the
entire history of Physics and for that matter of
the rest of Natural Sciences, the direction of
theoretical work was done, if you will,
"inwards" through a top-down
approach:
In
Mathematics, as we have noted, the
method of obtaining its results has
been exactly opposite being, if you
will, in the "outwards" direction
through a bottom-up
approach:
It
is this bottom-up "outwards"
path from the ground up that we shall
attempt to initiate as the new road or
path and direction of studying Nature
--a path that may be called the
trutonian (or the
trutonic) path or the
trutonic road
(truroad).
The
backbone of TRUTON is
causality,
i.e., the big WHY.
In TRUTON, causality that needs to be of
a physical and not mathematical in nature, is
its centerpiece. Describing Nature without its
physical casuality is not acceptable in
TRUTON. For example, in TRUTON
talking and describing gravity without
knowing its cause and origin of existence is not
an acceptable form of presentation.
